Example: Somali Bible - within Gen 16:14

USFM: \f + \fr 16:14 \fk Bi'ir Lahayroy \ft = Ceelka kan nool oo i arka \f*

OSIS:
<note placement="foot"><reference type="annotateRef">16:14</reference> <catchWord>Bi'ir Lahayroy = Ceelka kan nool oo i arka</catchWord></note>

Should be:
<note placement="foot"><reference type="annotateRef">16:14</reference> <catchWord>Bi'ir Lahayroy</catchWord> = Ceelka kan nool oo i arka</note>

Other footnote markers are processed incorrectly too!

Example: Somali Bible - within Exodus 20:5

\f + \fr 20:5 \ft Ilaah aan aqbalanayn in ilaah kale lala caabudo \f*

OSIS:
<note placement="foot"><reference type="annotateRef">20:5 Ilaah aan aqbalanayn in ilaah kale lala caabudo</reference></note>

Again because the script does not recognize implicit closure syntax, this time for the \fr REF by the \ft marker.

Should be:
<note placement="foot"><reference type="annotateRef">20:5</reference> Ilaah aan aqbalanayn in ilaah kale lala caabudo</note>

What seems to be the case from both examples is a failure to parse the footnote syntax in USFM for implicit closure.
This can probably be generalized to be a bug in processing both notes and cross-references.

From USFM 2.4 Syntax Notes:

The individual elements which make up the footnote or cross reference content are defined as character level markers, which means that they each define a beginning and a corresponding end marker. The Paratext translation editor will interpret the presence of a new marker as an implicit closure of any preceding character level marker. For this reason a majority of translation projects have adopted the approach of authoring footnote or cross reference content without supplying the explicit end marker.